tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post7907455140430557462..comments2024-03-27T17:15:58.243+08:00Comments on 弱格吉米言: [M42] Fujica EBC Fujinon-T 135mm f3.5Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-12560754683201156612011-06-09T12:25:32.488+08:002011-06-09T12:25:32.488+08:00Re: Steven <5007091415825988677>
軟我是覺得還好,可能我...Re: Steven <5007091415825988677><br />軟我是覺得還好,可能我還沒被 CY 毒到吧:P<br />倒是甲木兄所說的濁,我用 DA40、M40 拍底片的時候真的有感覺(我去年初以後就沒有P家數位機了),只不過我說不上來,甲木兄一字就道破。吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-50070914158259886772011-06-09T11:08:52.890+08:002011-06-09T11:08:52.890+08:00Pentax的M40或DA40我覺得有點怪,
色彩有點濁,影像也有一點軟,
雖然TESSAR 45全...Pentax的M40或DA40我覺得有點怪,<br />色彩有點濁,影像也有一點軟,<br />雖然TESSAR 45全開也不利,但影像很透.<br />所以一直沒有買入DA40...,<br />否則DA40很是吸引人啊!Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-56056713324614657792011-06-08T17:26:35.002+08:002011-06-08T17:26:35.002+08:00Re: Steven <8937334884117514909>
先謝謝甲木兄。
對了...Re: Steven <8937334884117514909><br />先謝謝甲木兄。<br /><br />對了,類似 tessar 結構的 Pentax-M 40 你怎麼看?吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-89373348841175149092011-06-08T10:30:00.853+08:002011-06-08T10:30:00.853+08:00OK!OK!
到時帶出來讓您拍拍看~OK!OK!<br />到時帶出來讓您拍拍看~Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-44535146219094341912011-06-07T22:26:35.977+08:002011-06-07T22:26:35.977+08:00Re: Steven <1853682981486176132>
有機會的話,定會到淡水...Re: Steven <1853682981486176132><br />有機會的話,定會到淡水找 Steven 聊聊相機的:-D 我還蠻想聽你聊 FA43 和 CY45 這兩顆的吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-18536829814861761322011-06-07T19:03:50.549+08:002011-06-07T19:03:50.549+08:00改天有來,帶P家機身來試試看,
因為這管我改成了PK接環了.改天有來,帶P家機身來試試看,<br />因為這管我改成了PK接環了.Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-67782843108723675082011-06-07T17:52:33.374+08:002011-06-07T17:52:33.374+08:00Re: Steven <5428010229606905952>
我知道甲木老大手裡有,...Re: Steven <5428010229606905952><br />我知道甲木老大手裡有,很肖想這顆呀 XD吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-54280102296069059522011-06-07T17:21:20.304+08:002011-06-07T17:21:20.304+08:00對的,像contax TESSAR 45/2.8,若有機會,
您一定要玩看看...呵呵(奸笑中)對的,像contax TESSAR 45/2.8,若有機會,<br />您一定要玩看看...呵呵(奸笑中)Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-31287722412266013822011-06-07T16:46:09.014+08:002011-06-07T16:46:09.014+08:00Re: Steven <3251849045091919269>
是不是可以說,因為鍍膜...Re: Steven <3251849045091919269><br />是不是可以說,因為鍍膜技術還沒那麼好,鏡片少一點通透率會好一些?吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-32518490450919192692011-06-07T16:42:36.208+08:002011-06-07T16:42:36.208+08:00是啊,135MM這焦段的老鏡的確是如此居多,
像ZEISS P135/2是五群五片.是啊,135MM這焦段的老鏡的確是如此居多,<br />像ZEISS P135/2是五群五片.Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-51572689357191183352011-06-07T16:20:56.415+08:002011-06-07T16:20:56.415+08:00Re: Steven <6099360072549529268>
哈哈,sorry so...Re: Steven <6099360072549529268><br />哈哈,sorry sorry,我的習慣很差勁,下次改進。<br /><br />我發現很多 135mm f3.5 老鏡都是四片四群耶,像 Takumar 135mm f3.5 也是,至少我碰過的幾顆最多好像就是五片四群吧... 簡單就是美呀..吉米言https://www.blogger.com/profile/03377911270977530663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737967.post-60993600725495292682011-06-07T16:04:10.782+08:002011-06-07T16:04:10.782+08:00第四張,金字塔下方兩直幅,有味哦!!
四群四片,真是簡單的結構啊...。
PS.建議照片編號一下吧...第四張,金字塔下方兩直幅,有味哦!!<br />四群四片,真是簡單的結構啊...。<br /><br />PS.建議照片編號一下吧~...@@bStevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541272530188296166noreply@blogger.com